Dear supporters of Margaret Dore and Choice is an Illusion
Today 6 December 2016, the South
African Supreme Court of Appeal has overturned the lower courts
authorisatin of euthanasia decision. The euthanasia side filed an
affidavit from an Oregon pro-assisted suicide doctor activist arguing
how well assisted suicide was being implemented in Oregon. Margaret Dore
filed an affidavit rebutting these claims.
Ultimately the court ruled that
faced with complex conflicting claims about the situation in foreign
juristictions, it could not decide on the question of whether assisted
suicide/euthanasia was being implemented well or not overeas - but left
the matter in substantial doubt and affirmed that given our
socio-economic context the probably of problems in South Africa was
greater than overseas. The point is though that I think Margaret Dore's
evidence at
Why Choice is an Illusion?
Showing posts with label Oregon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oregon. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 6, 2016
Monday, April 25, 2016
Dore Expert Witness Affidavit
Below, an excerpt from
the expert witness affidavit of Attorney Margaret K. Dore, filed in the
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa, SCA Case No: 531/2015.
13. Oregon's
act went into effect in 1997.
Washington's act, which is modelled on Oregon's act, went into effect in
2009. Both acts were passed by ballot
measures in which voters were promised that "only" the patient would
be allowed to administer the lethal dose. There is, however, no such language in either act. See
memo, pp. 10- 12 at “MD2,”and
article at “MD4.” Indeed, both acts
allow someone else to administer the lethal dose to the patient, which is
euthanasia. Id.
The Oregon and Washington Acts
12. The
Oregon and Washington "Death with Dignity Acts" legalize
physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia as those terms are traditionally
defined. See memo, pp. 2-3 (regarding
definitions) at "MD."
13. Oregon's
act went into effect in 1997.
Washington's act, which is modelled on Oregon's act, went into effect in
2009. Both acts were passed by ballot
measures in which voters were promised that "only" the patient would
be allowed to administer the lethal dose. There is, however, no such language in either act. See
memo, pp. 10- 12 at “MD2,”and
article at “MD4.” Indeed, both acts
allow someone else to administer the lethal dose to the patient, which is
euthanasia. Id.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
